HALF LIFE 1 HALLWAY TEXTURE FULL
HALF LIFE 1 HALLWAY TEXTURE SOFTWARE
HALF LIFE 1 HALLWAY TEXTURE PS2

They have a full blown year of work between them. great looking lightmaps in OpenGL mode.Īnd a year later half life had more complex level design, better textures, more focus on prefab destructible objects, a bit more objects to push around, and a smooth rendering system without jitter.ĭoes quake 2 look like shit compared to half life ? no. And if you are or where a gamer, you should know what one year could do for a game. Valve had an extra year of planning and possible development to fine tune their game and engine, this might have given it an edge. Half-life uses the Goldsource engine, a re-programmed quake engine, so it shares the same technological base as quake its engine from ID.

The lightmaps in the Quake 2 OpenGL mode where a big deal when it was released.

HALF LIFE 1 HALLWAY TEXTURE SOFTWARE

The software rendering from quake 2 looks worse than half life in both modes, but the original OpenGL rendering from quake 2 should actually look good for its time. This, coupled with Half-Life having a much more diverse and varied color palette compared to Quake 2, I think, really helped maintain the illusion a lot better, so that you'd be more immersed in the game and not noticed graphical limitations. The levels were kind of abstract - they started to look more like real environments, even compared to say, Quake 1, but Half-Life really went all-out to make it feel like you were in an actual place, that everything there had a function, that you could actually visit Black Mesa and the layout and everything would make sense. Quake 2 still kinda had that, 'Maze with fancy decorations,' mentality that went into many of iD's earlier games. The other thing, in my opinion, was the different approaches to level design. There's just something about smooth, realistic movement that makes us more willing to overlook problems in a character's design. Not that the games were this different in comparison, but to use an extreme example, you're much more forgiving of a low-detail model that moves smoothly and realistically than you are of a high-detail model that moves stiffly and artificially. One, as has been stated, I think the skeletal animations went a long way in terms of improving the appearance of the game. Underwater fog is slightly brighter, but not as bright as software mode or with gl_use_shaders 0 on vanilla.I think there are really two factors at work. If gl_overbright 1 is enabled (with HLFixes patch), gl_use_shaders does nothing. gl_use_shaders 0/1 and gl_overbright 1 with latest update, HLFixes 1.20 Beta 1: gl_use_shaders 0 and gl_overbright 0 with latest update, HLFixes 1.20 Beta 1: But this makes the black metal gate less visible as its should be. NOTE: HLFixes 1.20 Beta 1 is only compatible with older Nov 17 version, but it works fine with the Nov 19 patch.įogs looks extremely dark, and the brightness was reduced.

gl_use_shaders 1 and gl_overbright 0 with latest update, HLFixes 1.20 Beta 1: gl_use_shaders 1 with latest update, vanilla:īroken fog, obviously. gl_use_shaders 0 with latest update, vanilla:įog is bright, which makes the black metal gate more visible.

HALF LIFE 1 HALLWAY TEXTURE PS2

NOTE: everything below looks almost vanilla or vanilla with HLFixes, just with the PS2 rock textures and that was it, but the result should be the same. Better comparison after November 19 patch:

Half life 1 hallway texture